Crimes Behind the Uniforms of Indonesian State Apparatus

Crimes Behind the Uniforms of Indonesian State Apparatus are a persistent public concern. Uniforms intended to symbolize security and protection have, in some cases, become shields for officials abusing power. These crimes range from corruption, illegal levies, to serious human rights violations. This article examines these issues in depth, analyzing causes, real life examples, and policy recommendations to restore public trust.

Background

State institutions such as the police, military, and civil bureaucracy are meant to serve citizens. Yet, Indonesia history records multiple instances where officials became part of the problem. From authoritarian eras, when power was used to suppress opposition, to the reform era still plagued by corruption, extortion, and abuse of armed authority.

Reports from oversight agencies and investigative media indicate that weak internal supervision, ineffective justice systems, and a culture of impunity allow officials to evade accountability despite clear violations.

Types of Crimes by Officials

Crimes committed by state officials can be grouped into several categories:

  • Corruption: misuse of state budgets, manipulation of contracts, and bribery for promotions.
  • Illegal Levies: unauthorized collection of money from citizens or service users.
  • Human Rights Violations: physical abuse, arbitrary detention, and enforced disappearances.
  • Criminal Collaboration: involvement in illegal activities such as drugs or illegal mining.
  • Political Protection for Elites: using officials to secure the interests of specific groups.

Each category demonstrates how the symbol of authority can be misused for personal or group benefit, contrary to the principle of public service.

Underlying Causes

Several factors contribute to these crimes:

  1. Culture of Impunity: officials feel immune due to internal systems prioritizing loyalty over justice.
  2. Weak Oversight: supervisory bodies are often ineffective or politically influenced.
  3. Low Compensation: insufficient pay encourages seeking illicit income.
  4. Political Interference: officials are used for political purposes, shielding illegal actions for elite interests.
  5. Corporate Culture: excessive loyalty to superiors limits accountability and internal criticism.

Also Read : Strategies for Law Enforcement Against Cybercrime

Social and Economic Impacts

The consequences of these crimes are far reaching. Socially, public trust in institutions declines, causing citizens to refrain from reporting violations, reducing the effectiveness of the justice system. Economically, corruption and illegal levies increase transaction costs, deter investment, and reduce competitiveness.

Human rights violations create long-lasting trauma. Victims and families face psychological harm, social stigma, and economic difficulties due to limited access to justice. This further deepens social inequality.

Real Life Examples

Numerous cases have surfaced publicly, such as officials involved in drug trafficking, illegal mining protection, and bribery scandals in public service sectors. Reports from Indonesia Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) highlight high level officials implicated in infrastructure corruption. Human rights reports document instances of excessive violence by officers in conflict areas.

Reform Measures

To address crimes by officials, strategic actions include:

  • Increasing transparency through digitized public services.
  • Strengthening independent oversight bodies with greater authority.
  • Reforming compensation to reduce reliance on illicit income.
  • Ongoing ethics training on integrity and human rights.
  • Applying strict sanctions without exception, including for high ranking officials.

Consistent implementation is crucial, as reforms without political will often fail.

Role of Civil Society and Media

External oversight by civil society and media is essential. Investigative journalism uncovers hidden cases, NGOs provide legal assistance, and social media campaigns pressure institutions to improve transparency and accountability. Active civic engagement helps reduce abuses of power.


Crimes behind the uniforms of Indonesian state apparatus are complex and systemic. Yet, solutions exist through comprehensive reform, independent oversight, active civil society participation, and consistent law enforcement. Restoring the uniform as a symbol of protection rather than fear requires integrity, consistency, and long-term commitment.